Why Three in Four Corporates See a Compelling Case for Blockchain Technology

David Drake

According to Netscribes INC., the global blockchain technology market will be worth $13.96 billion by 2022, growing at a compound rate of 42.8%. This growth will likely be due to the uptake of the blockchain technology by mainstream industries in order to gain a competitive edge.

This view has been supported by a recent Deloitte survey that drew respondents from 1000 large companies in 7 countries. The outcome of the survey shows that 74% of the respondents feel there is compelling reason to use blockchain technology in building practical business applications.

Additionally, 34% of the businesses sampled pointed out that they have already initiated production of some form of blockchain technology. Further, 41% of the sampled are targeting to introduce a blockchain technology application in the next year.

Far-Reaching Impact

Proponents of blockchain technology point out that the economy will face a second shift from having greater control and little transparency to being extremely decentralised and highly transparent.

However, according to Reinhard Berger, CEO at
PECUNIO, the second shift is more speculative, but it is a logical progression based on where the markets are today.

He notes that, "The second shift is more speculative as we'll start to see more regulation. However, it is a logical progression based on where the markets are today and how this has already played out elsewhere. Here are some six firms as examples, Nokia is letting consumers monetize their data with blockchain, J.P. Morgan Chase and Co presented a prototype of its blockchain platform for capital markets while Bitbond, a German bank, is utilizing Bitcoin to allow international transfer of loans."

Berger further adds that, "Wall Street vet Brian Kelly launches blockchain exchange traded fund, New York stock exchange parent intercontinental exchange is planning a Bitcoin exchange while IBM, Global System set blockchain developers humanitarian aid challenge."

Long-Term Value

According to Dan Ramirez, CEO at
Vanig, the possible upsurge in blockchain adoption will drive the long-term value of utility and security tokens, as well as coins. This is due to the new focus that makes it easier for corporations to adopt blockchain technology.

He says, "We are indeed staring at a possible upsurge in corporate blockchain adoption. As the industry continues to mature, new focuses have come into view such as responsible education and reporting, developing foundational industry standards, and simplified solutions that will make it easier for corporations to adopt blockchain technology. This will be a massive boom for the cryptocurrency industry as true widespread adoption, among consumers and the enterprise, is what will drive long-term value for both utility and security tokens and coins."

In Ramirez's view, various companies are already utilizing blockchain technology. "For example, powered by the hyperledger blockchain Vanig, aims to create a platform that changes the way e-commerce works. By simplifying supply chain processes for manufacturers and retailers, as well as shopping experiences for consumers, Vanig is changing the way the entire e-commerce industry interacts with one another," he adds.

Denis Farnosov, founder and CEO of
AlfaToken is of the opinion that development of enterprise applications will catalyze wider blockchain adoption.

He notes, “The increased development of enterprise applications will bring macro benefits to the cryptocurrency industry. The growth of private blockchains will bring spillover benefits to public applications. We can see wider adoption, improved security and an increase in demand for smart contracts.”

Even so, Carl Kirchhoff, CEO and co-founder of
SportsFix predicts that companies may not make a complete shift to blockchain. He says, "Companies will still rely on centralised ledgers but may adopt smart contracts for the cost saving benefits. Unfortunately, corporations may take the most beneficial uses of the blockchain for themselves while excluding the other parts that are not advantageous to them."

Disclaimer: David Drake is on the advisory board for most of the firms mentioned or quoted in this article.